From the monthly archives: June 2008

I’ve just been away for a few days from my reader, and now I’m back there is a ton of catch-up reading to do.

Thank you for your prayers, everyone. The ER trip yesterday was short and sweet (3 1/2 hours, including waiting time!) — thank goodness I was not confined; just given 2 bags of fluids and sugar to give me a boost, and 2 prescriptions that already have helped tremendously. I’m still experiencing nausea, but more tolerable than the past 5 days. At least I’m able to fight it off better. It also helps that my fabulous mom is here to help out.

So anyway, enough about me… I’m here to share some links:

For Aisa, who I believe is still reading Fabiola:
from Tea at Trianon

Why Men Don’t Court Women Anymore
Comment: Southern men (US, I mean) and properly-trained Filipinos — seem to be the last remaining bastion of chivalry. I am very thankful courtship was still very much alive when dh courted me, or at least in our generation it seemed that way. In our small group of friends which included 3 other Filipino men, ALL of them courted their would-be wives. Maybe one of these days I’ll write how it was to be courted Filipino-style in modern-day America.

I am so tempted to print out copies of this and leave them anonymously all over our Parish…. (on dressing modestly for Mass)

When do we get one of these here in Ohio? Methinks a looooong while, as it’s a bit too progressive here. My response to the complainers: What, don’t you have enough anti-life pharmacies to begrudge the pro-life folks their own??? It’s not like you couldn’t drive down a few blocks to the nearest one. From what I can tell online, Chantilly, VA isn’t exactly the boondocks.

So many great crafty ideas!!! I followed the link from Kim who originally got it from Amy. Now that I have hope of having more than a few minutes each day of feeling good enough to drive and go around, a trip to Michael’s to finally stock up on summer crafty things should be just the thing to combat the kids’ summer boredom. (Tho’ not Aisa’s, who’s hoping to finish all her requirements to graduate from high school in August!!)

LOL. I clicked because I thought it was a recipe — Domenico Bettinelli is a fellow foodie — and I’m looking for some salads to round up Aisa’s graduation party menu in a few months. I got a cute story instead :) .

He also wonders if one can copyright a recipe. Since this is an issue several Filipino food bloggers have had to contend with including myself — too many that we even had to put up a one-time blogging event to call attention to the problem back in ’05 — I put in my .02.

Oh, so, so true. (on clutter)

Why Communion on the Tongue?

Tagged with:
 

Disclaimer: I know this is a controversial post. I am not looking to begin a debate about any of the issues. I am simply compiling these links and excerpts within to present the facts to my daughter, who is at the aqe (17) where she needs to think more deeply on these things. The conscience of a Catholic is between him/her and God. However, as a Catholic parent it is my duty to help form my children’s consciences. However they use their consciences when the time comes is up to them. I will not be in the voting booth.

Worthiness to Receive Holy Communion — General Principles
by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger

Important points:

From #1. The practice of indiscriminately presenting oneself to receive Holy Communion, merely as a consequence of being present at Mass, is an abuse that must be corrected.

Reverence for the Eucharist is paramount. This is Jesus that we receive at the altar. It is not some wafer that we partake of without looking at our worthiness to do so. We should be coming to the altar with clean hearts and clean souls, knowing that we are in full communion with Christ and His Church.

From #2. This cooperation can never be justified either by invoking respect for the freedom of others or by appealing to the fact that civil law permits it or requires it.

This answers your question about some of your friends’ beliefs, Ais. We can respect and tolerate everyone’s beliefs. We do not have the right to force our opinions on them. But that doesn’t mean we express this respect and tolerance by going against what is the very grain of OUR belief. We cannot vote based on respect for someone else’s concept of freedom.

Everyone has the right to drive a car, provided they’ve got a license. That doesn’t mean we should all be free to run over people anytime we want to. With freedom comes responsibility. True freedom only comes when we operate within the rules. Freedom on the highway doesn’t mean you can drive any direction at any speed you choose. Freedom means following the rules, making it safe for everyone and not just a select few.

From #3. There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with regard to abortion and euthanasia.

Dad and I don’t agree on the war. He doesn’t agree with the Pope 100% on this matter, but that doesn’t make Daddy a bad Catholic. However, on the issue of abortion, we do not (cannot, will not) go against the teachings of the Church. The Church is unequivocal about abortion and euthanasia being an EVIL, and rightly so. God giveth and God taketh away. We have no right to put an ending to what the Author of Life has penned. It is not our story to tell.

A Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in evil, and so unworthy to present himself for Holy Communion, if he were to deliberately vote for a candidate precisely because of the candidate’s permissive stand on abortion and/or euthanasia. When a Catholic does not share a candidate’s stand in favour of abortion and/or euthanasia, but votes for that candidate for other reasons, it is considered remote material cooperation, which can be permitted in the presence of proportionate reasons.

Now you get to compare Obama and McCain’s voting record. (pdf file)

We were talking about the “lesser of two evils” question. Here’s an excerpt from another LifeSite article (Can Catholics Who Vote for Obama Still Receive Communion?) that speaks to this:

As Bishop Rene Henry Gracida, of Corpus Christi Texas, explained in September 2004: “Consider the case of a Catholic voter who must choose between three candidates: Kerry, who is completely for abortion on demand, Bush, who is in favor of very limited abortion, i.e., in favor of greatly restricting abortion and Peroutka, a candidate who is completely against abortion but who is universally recognized as being unelectable. The Catholic can vote for Peroutka, but that will probably only help ensure the election of Kerry. Therefore the Catholic voter has a proportionate reason to vote for Bush, since his vote might help to ensure the defeat of Kerry and might result in the saving of some innocent human lives.”

I think the answer is quite clear.


Additional info:

Something that may be useful to you if you decide to write a paper on Planned Parenthood and Margaret Sanger: Margaret Sanger would have loved Barack Obama by Clenard Childress (a non-Catholic, BTW)

And an article that tackles why some Catholics support Obama: Roman Catholics for Obama ’08 by Paul Kengor

Lastly, don’t forget this: Obama’s Abortion Bombshell: Unrestricted Abortion Over Wishes of Individual States a Priority for Presidency


09/21/08, Edited to add:
Is it a sin to vote?

Tagged with:
 

That’s what I’m eating right now. I thought I had turned the corner over the weekend but yesterday I was back to feeling sick all afternoon and evening, and again today. Blech. I have no idea what I’m having 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours from now… sigh.

Tagged with:
 


119

As a 1930s wife, I am
Very Superior

Take the test!

Now I have a ton of things to REALLY shoot for.

Tagged with:
 

I’ve been sitting on my fingers the whole day, but I can’t do it anymore. (For one thing, stopping circulation may be bad for the baby and me.)

This morning while going through my blog reader, an article at Inside Catholic caught my eye — about 17 pregnant girls in Gloucester, MA. The article references another Time article which I then read. I was already seething by the time I got done but tried to focus on the day’s activities instead. Tonight with the family gone doing outside activities I turned the TV on — a once-in-a-blue-moon event here — and argh. It’s the first item on tonight’s news. Is there no escape? What I don’t get at all are the following:

. No one is questioning these girls’ psychological, mental, spiritual health at all. There were several women interviewed (none of them known to me) and one woman attributes the growing trend of teen pregnancy to the apparent new “coolness” of maternity apparel . WHAT?

. One girl chants, “Birth control, birth control, birth control.” Does anyone really think THAT’S the solution?

. The news report ends by saying that the “predominantly Catholic” town is now rethinking its position on birth control but that people are not happy about it. But they just leave it hanging there. Isn’t there a reporter out there who wants to get to the BOTTOM of this?

. Isn’t anyone puzzled that this is happening in a supposedly “fiercely Catholic” (Time) town? How “fiercely Catholic” would this town be if 17 girls are pregnant because they want unconditional love? Unconditional love is something that you get in a family, and if any family is truly “fiercely Catholic” you should be able to bet it’s there. Time DOES NOT even have a clue what fiercely Catholic means.

. As usual, it’s another indirect diss at the Church and Catholics. “You’re Catholic but look at the problems you’re having.” “If you condoned/taught birth control this wouldn’t be happening.” And yes, I WILL go there: I bet some people are saying, “This is what you get by teaching the pro-life message.” Uh-huh, because of course, EVERYONE understands what being pro-life really means.

. They mention that several of the teens are pregnant by a 24-year old homeless man and the sentence was delivered so matter-of-factly, as if it’s the most natural thing in the world. What is going on here??? No one even talks about STDs and the dangers of premarital sex. No one talks about putting this guy in jail!!

. People talk about Hollywood’s influence and the recent movie offerings glorifying teen pregnancy. But they conveniently forget that this problem isn’t caused by one factor alone.

. The Time article says no one has come up with better options. What about chastity or abstinence (and no, they don’t mean the same thing)? Aren’t these at least two of the obvious options here? It’s like this huge elephant in the room and NO ONE wants to acknowledge or discuss it.

. As usual, the common sense teachings of the Church are totally ignored.

I think I’ll go back to sitting on my fingers (lightly). After I duct tape my mouth.

Update: I found ONE article with comments that mentions abstinence education (take note, not CHASTITY education, big difference there). And the voices of the ones advocating abstinence education are immediately drowned out by those saying that abstinence education did not work, does not work, and will not work. I have no idea where they’re getting their stats. Why in the world are people so quick to dismiss the solutions that are right under our noses?

I think the problem is that the solution calls for US PARENTS to get off our butts and do something about this. And frankly, too many of us are not willing to do that. We’d rather have someone do the talking and the teaching for us. We’ve buried our heads in the sand and think that if we continue to do so, our kids are going to be miraculously spared. This is why I don’t understand those that say we shouldn’t be “imposing” our beliefs on our children. Well, guess what, if we’re always going to be so afraid about speaking to our children about the important stuff, because we’re so afraid we might influence them unnecessarily, SOMEONE or SOMETHING WILL influence them — the media, books, friends, etc. And it’s still unbelievable to me just how many parents these days are willing to take that risk.

Our children are not going to be perfect. They ARE going to make mistakes. They might make MAJOR mistakes with their lives. But I’d rather not have my child, 5, 10 years from now, look me in the eye, and say, “Mom, why did you not tell me…?”


And a friend just forwarded me this video, which is related, so…

Blind Society + Twisted Reasoning = ???

Last year, the family enjoyed a French movie called Le Papillon. There are a few adult-themed moments in the movie; we either pre-screen and then ff when watching with the kids, or talk over the dialogue. But the child and her developing relationship with the grumpy grandfather figure was just enchanting to watch. Yesterday, I found the cute song they were singing together (well, actually, Michel Serrault just talks, and Claire Bouanich sings):

The lyrics can be found in another youtube video with the movie scene itself.

Le Papillon (The Butterfly) French lyrics

Pourquoi les poules pondent des oeufs?
Pour que les oeufs fassent des poules.
Pourquoi les amoureux s’embrassent?
C’est pour que les pigeons roucoulent.
Pourquoi les jolies fleurs se fanent?
Parce que ça fait partie du charme.
Pourquoi le diable et le bon Dieu?
C’est pour faire parler les curieux.

Pourquoi le feu brûle le bois?
C’est pour bien réchauffer nos coeurs.
Pourquoi la mer se retire?
C’est pour qu’on lui dise Encore.
Pourquoi le soleil disparaît?
Pour l’autre partie du décor.
Pourquoi le diable et le bon Dieu?
C’est pour faire parler les curieux.

Pourquoi le loup mange l’agneau?
Parce qu’il faut bien se nourrir.
Pourquoi le lièvre et la tortue?
Parce que rien ne sert de courir.
Pourquoi les anges ont-ils des ailes?
Pour nous faire croire au Père Noël.
Pourquoi le diable et le bon Dieu?
C’est pour faire parler les curieux.

Ca t’a plu, le petit voyage?
Ah oui beaucoup!
Vous avez vu des belles choses?
J’aurais bien voulu voir des sauterelles
Des sauterelles ? Pourquoi des sauterelles ?
Et des libellules aussi,
A la prochaine fois, d’accord.
D’accord.

Je peux te demander quelque chose?
Quoi encore?
On continue mais cette fois-ci c’est toi qui chantes.
Pas question.
S’il te plait.
Non, mais non.
Allez, c’est le dernier couplet.
Tu ne crois pas que tu pousses un peu le bouchon?

Pourquoi notre coeur fait tic-tac?
Parce que la pluie fait flic flac.
Pourquoi le temps passe si vite?
Parce que le vent lui rend visite.
Pourquoi tu me prends par la main?
Parce qu’avec toi je suis bien.
Pourquoi le diable et le bon Dieu?
C’est pour faire parler les curieux.

Good for French lessons!

Tagged with:
 

Yup. Contrary to some people’s uninformed opinion, most of us homeschoolers aren’t “just” religious fanatics wanting to *impose* our religion on our unsuspecting brood. Yeah, we want to *impose* good math skills too.

H/T: Bettnet

Tagged with: